February 20, 2007 - ב' אדר תשס"ז


parashaFebruary 28, 2007 - י' אדר תשס"ז

This Shabbat is called Shabbat Zachor, which means ”The Shabbat of Remembering.”

We take out a second Torah scroll and read the Maftir from the Book of Deuteronomy (chapters 25:17-19) in which it says, “Remember what the nation of Amalek did to you on the way when you were leaving Egypt…They attacked all the weaklings at your rear when you were faint and exhausted and they did not fear G-d… Do not forget”

We must remember that tragically, every generation has its Amalek. Amalek comes in different shapes and guises. Sometimes it is Haman, sometimes it’s Hitler, and nowadays, it is rabid anti-Semites who are once again resurfacing all over the world. One thing is certain - until Moshiach comes, there will always be an Amalek, and the Torah adjures us not to be tolerant of the evil he represents.  Therefore, on Shabbat Zachor, we must all hear this passage read from the Torah which proclaims, “Remember - Do not forget!” and commit ourselves to be forces of justice and righteousness.

Kabbalah and eventsFebruary 28, 2007 - י' אדר תשס"ז

Copyright Meaningful Life Center.

… Before Haman was cast a pur—that is, the lottery—from day to day, and from month to month, to the twelfth month, the month of Adar

Esther 3:7

Purim is the plural of pur, which is Persian for “lottery.” Purim, the festival, is so called in reference to the several lotteries Haman had thrown to determine the date of his planned massacre of the Jewish people, G-d forbid.

Altogether, Haman consulted three lotteries. The first lottery was to choose the day of the week (the results of which were inconclusive), the second to select a month (which indicated the month of Adar as an auspicious time for Haman’s plans), and the third to determine the day of the month (the lot fell on the 13th).[1] The first lottery, however, seems superfluous: if the month and the day of the month are chosen, the day of the week is already known. Perhaps Haman wanted to test his luck by seeing whether his lotteries would corroborate. Yet the fact that the day-of-the-week lottery was the first one that Haman consulted indicates that the placement of his chosen day within the weekly cycle was of primary importance to him.
The Clocks of Nature

A cursory look at our calendar shows that we measure time in what seems an awkward and inconvenient way. To distinguish a certain date, we refer both to the seven-day weekly cycle as well as to the 29.5 day lunar cycle (which gives us alternating 29- and 30-day months)—two time systems which bear no relation to each other. Hence, if a given day of a given month falls on Shabbat one year, it may occur on a Monday on the next; a month might have four Fridays one year and five Fridays the next. Why not employ a system that places our days in a singular, uniform context?

Continue Reading »

parashaFebruary 23, 2007 - ה' אדר תשס"ז

By Simon Jacobson

The Talmud tells us (1) that “Moses found three things difficult (2), until G-d showed them to him with His finger: Menorah, HaChodesh (the new Moon) and Sherotzim (creepers)” (3).

Moses’ difficulty with the new moon was discussed a few weeks ago in this column. The problem Moses had with the “creeps” (creeping creatures) will be addressed in a future column. Today we will focus on Moses’ troubles with the Menorah.


Continue Reading »

parashaFebruary 16, 2007 - כ"ח שבט תשס"ז

By Simon Jacobson

Karl Popper, the Austrian-British philosopher of science, writes that “Science is not a system of certain, or well-established, statements; nor is it a system which steadily advances towards a state of finality. Our science is not knowledge: it can never claim to have attained truth, or even a substitute for it….We do not know: we can only guess. And our guesses are guided by the unscientific, the metaphysical (though biologically explicable) faith in laws, in regularities we can uncover/discover…The old scientific ideal of episteme—of absolutely certain, demonstrable knowledge—has proved to be an idol. The demand for scientific objectivity makes it inevitable that every scientific statement must remain tentative for ever….”

The physicist, Werner Heisenberg showed that in physics laws are at best probabilities. And the great mathematician, Kurt Goedel demonstrated the same in mathematics. In his famous Goedel’s Theorem he proves that there exist meaningful mathematical statements that are neither provable nor disprovable, now or ever. That is, not simply because human thought or knowledge is insufficiently advanced but because the very nature of logic renders them incapable of resolution, no matter how long the human race survives or how wise it becomes. “No axiomatic system containing arithmetic can demonstrate its own consistency, so we can never know for sure whether our system is consistent. Any such system must have true statements which are unprovable within the system.”

Continue Reading »

parashaFebruary 16, 2007 - כ"ח שבט תשס"ז

This week’s Torah portion (Mishpatim), which deals primarily with civil and tort law, presents the following law (1): If a man shall give money or vessels to his fellow to safeguard, and it is stolen from the house of the man, if the thief is found, he shall pay double.”

Simply put, the Torah is stating here the law that a thief need not only compensate the victim for the loss; he is also given a penalty, and is obligated needs to pay double the sum which he took. Yet, a well known axiom in Jewish thought is that every single passage in the Torah contains, in addition to its literal meaning, a psychological and spiritual interpretation. The physical and concrete dimension of a mitzvah may not always be practically relevant, yet its metaphysical message remains timelessly relevant in our inner hearts and psyches.

What is the psychological interpretation of the above law?

The Human Custodian

“If a man shall give money or vessels to his fellow to safeguard,” can be understood as a metaphor for the Creator of life entrusting man with “money and vessels to safeguard.” G-d grants each of us a body, a mind, a soul, a family and a little fraction of His world’s resources. He asks us to nurture them and protect them from a myriad of inner and outer forces that threaten to undermine them.

Yet, each of us also possesses an inner thief who schemes to steal these gifts and use them according to his own will. This “thief” represents the “destructive inclination ” — yatzer hara, in Talmudic jargon — that exists within the human psyche and constantly seeks to control his or her body, soul and life by abusing their identity, violating their integrity and derailing them from their appropriate course of action.

For example, when a powerful instinctive craving compels me to eat something destructive for my body or spirit, my inner “thief” — or destructive craving — has just “kidnapped” part of my existence and harmed it. Similarly, when I lie for short-term convenience, my inner “thief,” once again, has entered and robbed my “lips” and “words,” employing them for an immoral function, thereby degrading my conscience and soul. When I cheat in a business deal, my inner “thief” managed to get his hands on my business, and so forth.

Apathy and Guilt

There may be those few individual saints who never fail to safeguard their sacred space. Yet most of us are subjected to frequent visitations by this little thief who conquers chunks of our lives. How do we deal with it?

Some people ultimately feel that their battles against their inner thief are, in the end, destined for failure. They give up the fight, allowing the thief take whatever he wants, whenever he wants. They develop a certain lightheadedness and cynicism toward living a life of dignity and depth.

Others, at the other extreme, become deeply dejected and melancholy. Their failures instill within them feelings of self-loathing as they wallow in guilt and despair.

Judaism has rejected both of these notions, since both lead the human being into the abyss, one through carelessness and the other through depression (2).

The Majesty of Returning

The Torah, in the above law, offers instead this piece of advice:

“If a man shall give money or vessels to his fellow to safeguard, and it is stolen from the house of the man, if the thief is found, he shall pay double.” Go out, suggests the Torah, and find the thief. Then you will actually receive double of what you possessed originally!

Here we are introduced to, in subtle fashion, the exquisite dynamic known in Judaism as teshuvah, or psychological and moral returning. Instead of wallowing in your guilt and despair, and instead of surrendering to apathy and cynicism, you ought to identify and confront your “thief,” those forces within your life that keep derailing you. You need to reclaim ownership over your schedules, behaviors and patterns.

Then you will receive from the thief double the amount he took in the first place. What this means psychologically is that the experience of falling and rebounding will allow you to deepen your spirituality and dignity in a fashion double of what it might have been without the thievery.

The Talmud (3) puts it thus: “Great is repentance, for as a result of it, willful sins are transformed into virtues.”

When you, sadly, fail, and allow your life to go to shambles, but then confront the thief and reclaim your life as your own, those previous failures bestow upon you a perspective, an appreciation, a depth and a determination that otherwise would not have been possible. By engaging in the remarkable endeavor of teshuvah, the sin itself is redefined as a mitzvah. Why? Because the very failure and its resulted frustration generate a profound and authentic passion and appreciation for the good and the holy (4).”

The next time your inner thief hijacks your moral life, see it as a reclamation opportunity: Reclaim your life with a double dose of light and purity (5).

~~~~~~~~

Footnotes:
1) Exodus 22:6.
2) See Tanya beginning of Chap. 1 about the danger of both of these paths. Cf. Tanya end of chapter 36.
3) Yuma 86b.
4) Tanya chapter 7.
5) This essay is based on Sefas Emes Parshas Mishpatim, in the discourses of the year 5635, or 1875. The Sefas Emes, a Chassidic work on the Pentateuch, was authored by the second master of the Chassidic dynasty of Gur, Rabbi Yehudah Leib Alter (1847-1905). See there for the spiritual explanation behind the following verse: “If the thief is not found, then the householder shall approach the court that he had not laid his hand upon his fellow’s property.” (In other words, if the custodian (who is unpaid) claims that he is not responsible for the loss of the object, since it was stolen, he must come to court to swear that he has not made unauthorized personal use of the item.)
My thanks to Shmuel Levin, a writer and editor in Pittsburgh, for his editorial assistance.
~~~~~~~

www.algemeiner.com

parashaFebruary 9, 2007 - כ"א שבט תשס"ז

By Simon Jacobson

Do our senses help or impede our ability to experience reality?

Many schools of mysticism insist that to enter the sublime we need to shut down, or at least blunt, our senses. When you are overstimulated by the things you see, hear, taste, touch and smell, you become distracted from your inner voice. By closing your eyes (as we do when we recite the Shema) and quieting down the other senses, you can meditate and concentrate on the soul within yourself and others.

Witness how our level of focus is diminished when we are distracted by our ringing cell phones and buzzing blackberries. Just the other day, I was sitting in a meeting and could not believe how people throughout were busy peeking at their various gadgets. Besides the disrespect, how in heaven could anybody truly apply the necessary attention to the issues at hand? How would we feel if a surgeon operating on our loved one was e-mailing his dinners plans while holding a scalpel in his other hand?! (Obviously, a pedestrian office meeting cannot be compared to surgery, but the point is still the same).

Thus, the case is made that in order to allow our souls to speak we need to subdue our senses. We need to escape the “rush hour” and quiet down our lives. Silence and serenity create a conducive environment for the soulful experience.

Continue Reading »

parashaFebruary 9, 2007 - כ"א שבט תשס"ז

Yosef Y. Jacobson

The tenth and final of the Ten Commandments recorded in this week’s portion (Yisro) reads: “You shall not covet your neighbor’s house; you shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, and anything that belongs to your neighbor (Exodus 20″14).”

The structure of the verse seems strange. In the beginning, the Bible specifies six things we should not covet: “You shall not covet your neighbor’s house; you shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his donkey.” But then, at the conclusion of the verse, the Bible states: “And anything that belongs to your neighbor.” Why the unnecessary redundancy? Why not just state at the onset “You shall not covet anything that belongs to your neighbor,” which would include all of the specifics? And if the Torah does not want to rely on generalizations and wishes to specify details, why does it specify only a few items and then revert to a generalization, “And anything that belongs to your neighbor?”


Continue Reading »

Kabbalah and parashaFebruary 2, 2007 - י"ד שבט תשס"ז

by Rabbi Shimon Jacobson

This weekend has a special name: “Shabbat Shirah” – the Shabbat of Song, so called because this week’s Torah portion contains the song sung by Israel after the parting of the Red Sea. Accordingly, this week’s essay addresses the soul of song – the power it has to transform our lives.

What gives music its power? How does it have the ability to transport us to another time and place? To lift a broken spirit? To bring a tear to a happy soul? Why does a song have the capacity to reach the depths of our heart, bring old memories alive, awaken our deepest aspirations and naturally cause us to dance to its beat?

What type of language is this language of song, and where did it originate? We learn the spoken language at home and at school. But who taught us how to sing?

What is the soul of song?

Continue Reading »

parashaFebruary 1, 2007 - י"ג שבט תשס"ז

The Torah portion of Beshalach describes how, after “Israel beheld the mighty hand which G-d wielded against the Egyptians, … Then Moshe and the children of Israel sang this song (shirah) … and they declared saying: ‘I will sing….’ ”

It is self-evident from this verse that Moshe began the shirah before the children of Israel did. But there is a dispute in the Gemara as to what portion was sung by the Jewish people:

According to R. Akiva, only Moshe recited the entire shirah; the nation merely responded: “I will sing to G-d.”


Continue Reading »

Kabbalah and events and servicesFebruary 1, 2007 - י"ג שבט תשס"ז

Copyright: Gal Einai Institute

The Tree — Man and the Torah


In accordance with the opinion of the House of Hillel, the 15th day of the month of Shevat–Tu Bee’shvat–is the “New Year of Trees.” The opinion of the House of Shamai is that the “New Year of Trees” is the 1st day of Shvat–Rosh Chodesh Shvat.

Tu b’Shevat marks the day that the majority of the winter rains have passed and that new sap–lifeforce–begins to ascend from the earth into the trunk and branches of the trees. New fruit begins to appear at the tips of the branches, thus beginning (in halachah) a “New Year of Trees.”

In the Torah, the tree symbolizes both man (”You [the Jewish people] are called ‘man’”)–”for man is the tree of the field”–and the Torah–”It [the Torah] is a tree of life for all that hold onto it.” Both man and the Torah possess all of the four major components of the tree: roots, trunk, branches, fruit.

The roots of man (the Jewish people) are our ancestors, the patriarchs and matriarchs of our people–”the holy ones who are in the earth.” The trunk corresponds to the full body of the people of Israel that were redeemed (”born”) from Egypt, received the Torah at Mt. Sinai and entered the land of Israel.

The branches represent the tribes of Israel (in Hebrew, the word for “tribe,” shevet–identical with the name of the month of Shevat–literally means a “branch” of a tree), and the individual tribe-members, which spread out and away from one another, each settling his own portion of the Holy Land (and who subsequently become even more dispersed, around the world, in time of exile). The fruit of the tree are the good deeds performed by each Jewish soul.

Continue Reading »